Improving Intelligence by making it LIVING
| Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Bookmark This (Add to Digg, del.icio.us, reddit and others)View blog reactions
| Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Bookmark This (Add to Digg, del.icio.us, reddit and others)The Partnership for Public Service will honor 30 finalists for Service to America Medals May 6 in Washington as part of Public Service Recognition Week. The finalists are contenders for nine medals, including Federal Employee of the Year, set to be presented Sept. 23.30 finalists for Service to America Medals named - Federal news, government operations, agency management, pay & benefits - FederalTimes.com
Tags: intellipedia, donburke, sean dennehy, cia, homeland security medal
Comments Welcome!| Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Bookmark This (Add to Digg, del.icio.us, reddit and others)I had the pleasure of speaking with Andrea Baker recently about Intellipedia and all the great things she is doing.
We talked about:
Listen in!
BTW, here's Andrea's bio:
Andrea Baker served in the United States Army from 1994-1998 as a Signals Intelligence Analyst and an Arabic Linguist. Following her military service in the Army, Andrea became a career consultant for the Federal Government, supporting the CIA, DIA, NSA, NOAA, and the Pentagon. Andrea's background originally started in web design, graphics and web development and has transitioned from development and design over the years from multimedia design, technical lead, and project manager. In 2005, Andrea noticed the growing social web on the Internet and saw the future of how this could be applied to business and Government. Andrea joined Navstar, Inc. in 2006 as the Director of Technology. Under this role Andrea has helped their customers utilize Enterprise 2.0 tools effectively. She specializes in the user community advocacy and application developer liaison, through tools like wikis, blogs, and other social web tools.
About Navstar:
Navstar’s Mission is to provide Information Technology Services and Innovative Enterprise Consulting Solutions to our customers. We accomplish this by delivering quality services on time and within budget while meeting and exceeding our customer’s expectations.
Navstar highlights:
Tags: andreabaker, intellipedia, intelligence community, a-space, gardener, don burke, sean dennehy, wikipedia, webcam, collaboration, information sharing, change.gov, obama, second life, rss feed sharing
Comments Welcome!| Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Bookmark This (Add to Digg, del.icio.us, reddit and others)I had the great opportunity to speak with Chris Rasmussen, Social Software Knowledge Manager and Trainer, US Intelligence Community, or in other words, one of the pioneers of the Intellipedia and social media movement in the Intelligence Community and the United States government, in general. (His full bio is below.)
We spoke about how he became involved with Intellipedia, the past, present and potential future of Intellipedia, virtual worlds, global collaboration, open source intelligence, mashups (can I call it "intellimashing" :) and purple intelligence. Don't know what purple intelligence is? Well, then you should listen below:
Why is it news that Google sells to the Intelligence Community? Would it be news if Google sold servers or donated (for that matter) to a group that is looking to end world poverty?
Or are they just piggybacking on Intellipedia's success (not that Google needs it)?
Or could it be just opportunistic PR for Google. Personally, I think it's the latter since I doubt that Google only recently started pursuing government work.
It also helps to have a CIA Intellipedia expert, like Sean Dennehy, comment about Intellipedia in the same article (though he does not necessarily endorse Google). It adds to Google's credibility (again not that they need it).
Don't get me wrong, I like Google. I just wanted to point out their cleverness! :) Looks like their innovation does end in the server room! ;-)
| Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Bookmark This (Add to Digg, del.icio.us, reddit and others)I came across a post on the MAZZ-INT blog on AFCEA's website. It appears that he went to the Analytic Transformation conference (that I really wanted to go to :) and from what he wrote, it appears that he has seen this before to some extent. Not the specific technologies that are being used in Intel 2.0 (e.g. Intellipedia and A-Space), but the thought processes behind them. And he notes the following at the end of his post:
Going back to the future, it is worth remembering those CMS [what some think of as the predecessor to the DNI] IC collaboration conferences showed, and the 9-11 and WMD commissions found, that IT tools and DCIDs don’t naturally lead to collaboration or intelligence sharing. The captain in Cool Hand Luke learning that he could not mandate communication should be a cautionary tale for the IC on this journey to transform analysis.
My advice to the IC is this: get the tools discussed in Chicago to transform analysis through collaboration and intelligence sharing in place quickly, but do not expect this behavior to be commonplace until the community leadership models it, values it, and incentivizes it.
In his post and words, I see skeptical optimism in his words. They are the words of someone who has seen and heard this before but is hopeful that this time it will be different.
So the real question to the entire community is: What is going to be different about this time around?
Anyone care to elaborate or speculate?
One note, based on Jesse Wilson's comments regarding General Cartwright, I think some leaders are already modeling and valuing "it." Now let's see if they incentivize it!
| Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Bookmark This (Add to Digg, del.icio.us, reddit and others)Just came across Jesse Wilson's post addressing some of Intellipedia's criticisms. It is good to get more perspective from what appears to be a person that actually uses Intellipedia (since he states he works for the government and writes as if he actually has personally used it).
The 3 criticisms he addresses are: (1) seniors won’t use it; (2) it perpetuates bad information; and (3) its never really useable
I think that 2nd and 3rd criticisms can be dispelled for the same reasons that Wikipedia works. The first criticism and Jesse's response is more interesting though. Check it out and let me know what you think?
I'll let you know what I think after some comments have been posted...
One thing that will be curious to see is whether General Cartwright will bring his Command & Control blog to the Pentagon as Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, which Spook86 discusses in his "In From the Cold" Blog. Anyone know?
| Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Bookmark This (Add to Digg, del.icio.us, reddit and others)